logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Do I give up my outdrive?
ComputerJoe
#1 Posted : Saturday, July 09, 2011 6:35:04 AM(UTC)
ComputerJoe

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2007(UTC)
Posts: 603
Points: 1,119

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I have a 26’ Marinette, 10’ beam, with a 225hp gm small block engine. I carry a lot of weight in scuba divers and their gear so speed is not my major consideration but durability and the ability to push a heavy loaded boat thru the water is. I have the only Marinette I've seen with an outdrive. The dam thing has cost me thousands in lost revenue due to the sterndrive breakdowns. I now have to make a decision on what to do... fixed prop conversion or find a stern drive to replace this 1969 Mercruiser II with. Cost is a big factor.

The easiest route seems to be to get an entirely new stern unit. Problem is most want to pull cooling water and exhaust plumbing thru the drive unit. I am plumbed with a thru-hull raw water inlet and the standard Marinette exhaust ports. I've seen a lot of racing sterndrives that have the same arrangement. Mercruiser TR/TRS units are going obsolete but I've seen a MercruiseTrans II and was really impressed with how heavily the thing was built. I was unsure if these racing units would have enough depth when hung on my transom.

What do you guys think?
Sponsor
Please Register : To weed out spammers, new members may not post until approved. An email is usually sent after approval. This forum is for Marinette Owners and other aluminum boat boaters who wish to share boating information. Aluminum Roamer owners are also welcome. (Do not post content you do not have the right to post and mass (robots) posters are unwelcome. We also have a marine electronics page and lots of Chrysler Engine info. State by what permission you copy content and give credit properly.) The site is now fixed with some more Chrysler information. We have space for pictures on the new location. Use shinkpic to autochange size http://www.onthegosoft.com/sp_download.htm

Great Sites - http://www.marinette.com Marinette Company

http://web.me.com/dougmrose/Doug_Roses_Website/Welcome.html

http://fastjeff.tripod.com/ Repair Tricks and Techniques for Marinettes

http://www.greatlakesmarinetteclub.com/

PLEASE post in the appropriate folder. Please, do not post your actual email address in publicly readable websites. The first rule is be a class act.

fastjeff
#2 Posted : Saturday, July 09, 2011 10:17:45 AM(UTC)
fastjeff

Rank: Administration

Medals: aluminum star: For Marinette Owners Everywhere above the call of duty

Groups: Admin2, Admin2, Admin, Administration, Member
Joined: 12/5/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,133
Points: 5,732

Was thanked: 34 time(s) in 30 post(s)
There is another option, seeing you already have a reinforced transom: An outboard. It would be far lighter back there, which would help plane off and trim, plus you cna carry more weight aft. Lots of good used ones out there at the moment, costing as much or less than a new outdrive.

You'd need an extended mounting bracket that you could fab up of aluminum or purchase. Longer cables will work the throttle and shifter from your present controls, and a new steering cable can be adapted fairly easily. Best of all, modern outboards are reliable and--if something goes wrong--easier to remove than an inboard.


Something to consider.

Jeff
"...reality is not nearly as lovely as the world of Liberal Land. No wonder so many people want to go there." - Tom Sowell

ComputerJoe
#3 Posted : Saturday, July 09, 2011 1:01:24 PM(UTC)
ComputerJoe

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2007(UTC)
Posts: 603
Points: 1,119

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Hmmm...

A four stroke wouldn't require mixing two stroke fuel and could draw from my current tanks.

Would you think a outboard would push and be as durable as my 327 chevy that I just rebuilt?
I would like to have two smaller outboards to feel safer about this idea, but don't think the stiffening plate is wide enough for two, especially because of the big hole in it where my sterndrive lives now.

fastjeff
#4 Posted : Saturday, July 09, 2011 7:27:31 PM(UTC)
fastjeff

Rank: Administration

Medals: aluminum star: For Marinette Owners Everywhere above the call of duty

Groups: Admin2, Admin2, Admin, Administration, Member
Joined: 12/5/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,133
Points: 5,732

Was thanked: 34 time(s) in 30 post(s)
There'd be so much less weight back there a 200 hp OB would move it easily. As for twin engines, OBs are very reliable nowadays.


Jeff

PS: There's a video out there of a guy who converted a Marinette to OB power. Went great with far less than 200 hp, and I think it was an old 26 footer. Anyone have the URL?
"...reality is not nearly as lovely as the world of Liberal Land. No wonder so many people want to go there." - Tom Sowell

1 user thanked fastjeff for this useful post.
26refit on 7/13/2011(UTC)
HuckFinn
#5 Posted : Sunday, July 10, 2011 8:54:17 AM(UTC)
HuckFinn

Rank: Dedicated Tin Star

Groups: Member
Joined: 9/22/2009(UTC)
Posts: 92
Points: -297

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Yea, he re-powered with 2 Suzuki outboards...http://backyardboatyard.com
PT-73
1973 32' FB Express

Chrysler 318's
ComputerJoe
#6 Posted : Sunday, July 10, 2011 2:10:48 PM(UTC)
ComputerJoe

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2007(UTC)
Posts: 603
Points: 1,119

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Holy Crap!
I could drop 6 to 10k on an outboard!

I was impressed with a MercTrans II sterndrive I saw, I think the TR/TRS are simliar...to bad the lower housing was cracked. The thing was a tank! Don't know if parts are available for something like that but I would guess that I would have a whole lot less labor into replacing a sterndrive than I would hanging a bracket and pulling my engine for an outboard.

Still thinking this one over...I'm planning on it as winter work.


Thanks
Docsnow
#7 Posted : Sunday, July 10, 2011 3:29:39 PM(UTC)
Docsnow

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Admin, Administration
Joined: 12/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,871
Points: 4,247

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 28 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ComputerJoe Go to Quoted Post
Holy Crap!I could drop 6 to 10k on an outboard!


Joe If I had your $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ I'd burn mine Think Hey the new thing in O/B's are Johnson "E Tech" will pull any O/B backwards + less maintenance than a 4 stroke & U can still run off your main tank cause it's oil injected & a lot quieter then a 4 stroke Dancing But than U been hanging with uncle Jeffster & he's rubbing off on Ya spend them $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ before someone else does d'oh!

Norm,

Big BigMs Live On Applause

http://www.picturetrail.com/gid23690601 Try it now there's music to listen to while U view the Big M's

http://www.PictureTrail..../index.php?clubID=20726 this one for the Pix club


 You'll have bad times, but they'll just wake you up to the good times you weren't paying attention to

Some people try to turn back their odometers.Not me, I want people to know "why" I look this way.I've traveled a long way and some of the roads weren't paved.
fastjeff
#8 Posted : Tuesday, July 12, 2011 5:34:28 AM(UTC)
fastjeff

Rank: Administration

Medals: aluminum star: For Marinette Owners Everywhere above the call of duty

Groups: Admin2, Admin2, Admin, Administration, Member
Joined: 12/5/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,133
Points: 5,732

Was thanked: 34 time(s) in 30 post(s)
That old Mercruser drive (with the conventional marine transmission inside the boat) is the BEST outdrive setup I've seen: smooth shifting and durable. Too bad that it cost way more than the slam/ clunk designs that took its place.


Jeff
"...reality is not nearly as lovely as the world of Liberal Land. No wonder so many people want to go there." - Tom Sowell

dougrose
#9 Posted : Tuesday, July 12, 2011 7:26:57 AM(UTC)
dougrose

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Member, Administration, Admin
Joined: 12/7/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,332
Points: 1,746

Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 21 post(s)
There is a real advantage to swiveling the prop for steering - the only way to get that kind of maneuverability in an inboard is with twins. I suspect that a lightweight outboard that can tilt up out of the water would be the least trouble. My friends at Bombardier make a very good two-stroke. The direct-injection has completely changed the two-stroke, it is just not the same ornery engine it used to be. Not as simple either. Evinrude makes a 250 hp outboard that weighs 515 lbs, not bad considering that it is the complete power train.

For reliability, I would forget the twins and invest in a good radio or cellphone booster, depending, and a SeaTow membership. Cheaper.


1975 32' Flybridge Sedan, twin Perkins 6-354 diesels, 1:1.53 velvetdrives, 16 X 19 props. Merritt Island, Florida
ComputerJoe
#10 Posted : Wednesday, July 13, 2011 5:51:08 AM(UTC)
ComputerJoe

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2007(UTC)
Posts: 603
Points: 1,119

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
As a fixed prop/transmission seems the most reliable way to go I now have to figure if I have the room.

Does anyone have info on how far from the engine do I need to make my thru-hull for the shaft packing?

I have a single GM engine and have no idea how much room behind my engine the tranny and the prop shaft will need.

Docsnow
#11 Posted : Wednesday, July 13, 2011 7:55:06 AM(UTC)
Docsnow

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Admin, Administration
Joined: 12/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,871
Points: 4,247

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 28 post(s)
Joe,

If U look on John A. part site the shaft size lengths R 6' so with the prop end sticking out pass the strut U might wantta measure from front of the strut to the threaded end of the shaft the rule of thumb is what ever size the shaft is lets take 1-1/4 “ the taper should B about 1-1/4" away than subtract that length from the 6' length plus the coupling width & that should put U in the ballpark Think

Norm,

Big BigMs Live On Dancing
http://www.picturetrail.com/gid23690601 Try it now there's music to listen to while U view the Big M's

http://www.PictureTrail..../index.php?clubID=20726 this one for the Pix club


 You'll have bad times, but they'll just wake you up to the good times you weren't paying attention to

Some people try to turn back their odometers.Not me, I want people to know "why" I look this way.I've traveled a long way and some of the roads weren't paved.
ComputerJoe
#12 Posted : Thursday, July 14, 2011 6:36:34 AM(UTC)
ComputerJoe

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2007(UTC)
Posts: 603
Points: 1,119

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
OK Doc,
6' less 1-1/4" gives me 70-3/4" for the shaft.
Now how much do I figure for the tranny and u-joint from the engine to the shaft?
Docsnow
#13 Posted : Thursday, July 14, 2011 7:26:17 AM(UTC)
Docsnow

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Admin, Administration
Joined: 12/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,871
Points: 4,247

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 28 post(s)
C Joe,

That's a 1 1/4" plus the length from the beginning of the taper to the end of the threads Whistle Than U'll have to measure all the components Think minus the part of the shaft that goes in to the coupling. Hey I'll send U a rubber ruler that I use Pray & make it read what ever size I want it 2 B Brick wall but than I usually end up cutting twice Brick wall

Norm,

Big BigMs Live On Applause
http://www.picturetrail.com/gid23690601 Try it now there's music to listen to while U view the Big M's

http://www.PictureTrail..../index.php?clubID=20726 this one for the Pix club


 You'll have bad times, but they'll just wake you up to the good times you weren't paying attention to

Some people try to turn back their odometers.Not me, I want people to know "why" I look this way.I've traveled a long way and some of the roads weren't paved.
dougrose
#14 Posted : Thursday, July 14, 2011 8:25:30 PM(UTC)
dougrose

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Member, Administration, Admin
Joined: 12/7/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,332
Points: 1,746

Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 21 post(s)
Tranny and u-joint? The stock setup has the engine tilted back about 14 degrees so that the crankshaft and tranny are in line with the shaft, which attaches to the tranny with a flange.

If you use a jointed shaft, you should use CV joints unless the crankshaft is parallel with the propshaft. If you do this, you should provide a thrust bearing at the front of the propeller shaft so as not to put that load onto the flexible joint. This setup is common in Europe and I did it on my 28'. I will make up a drawing if that would help at all.

But, the wonderful simplicity of shaft drive is lost.


1975 32' Flybridge Sedan, twin Perkins 6-354 diesels, 1:1.53 velvetdrives, 16 X 19 props. Merritt Island, Florida
ComputerJoe
#15 Posted : Thursday, July 21, 2011 6:40:15 AM(UTC)
ComputerJoe

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2007(UTC)
Posts: 603
Points: 1,119

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Been away for a few days...getting parts. I have my Stern drive back, just have to put 7 qts of gear lube in it. Looking for which lube to use. I saw 90 weight but that's for smaller horse power units. Tractor Supply has 90-140 wt but that looked thicher that the marine stuff that the Mervruise dealer put in.

A drawing would help a lot Doug. I also was told there are "V" drives where you turn the engine around and the prop shaft goes underneath the engine. Any opinions??? Are the Velvet drives I've heard tell about "V" drives?

Thanks ALL
tr_guy79
#16 Posted : Thursday, July 21, 2011 9:33:35 AM(UTC)
tr_guy79

Rank: Top Rank Aluminum Star

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/17/2009(UTC)
Posts: 212
Points: 460

Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 8 post(s)

I don't think a V-drive is going to give you what you are looking for:

Pros:
1. It allows you to put the engine closer to the transom

Cons:
1. Reduced efficiency due to added drivetrain drag
2. Makes adjusting and changing packing very difficult
3. Makes transmission removal much more difficult
4. More expensive to purchase
5. Increases the installed height of the engine
6. Moves the boats center of gravity rearward (harder to plane / increased minimum planing speed)
7. Adds (some) drivetrain noise
8. More difficult access to prop flange

IMO, the most reliable automotive based engine setup is good 'ol detroit iron running through a 1:1 velvet drive. Though I love my Mopars, as far as parts cost and availability, a small block chevy is hard to beat.

For overall reliability and ease of repair, and single 200-250hp outboard is hard to beat, though the cost can be a bit much.

If I were in your shoes... Stick with the I/O, keep up with maintenance, and enjoy many years of trouble free service. Though I am partial to VP drives (A 280pt is hard to beat for simplicity and durability), the Merc drives are pretty good too, though ignition cut out was a dumb idea, and the impeller IN the drive was also not a great idea. The VP units have no ignition interrupt and use a much more robust dog clutch. They also use an IB drive plate instead of a rubber coupler, and have an IB style impeller pump...

-Shane
"McKenna Renee"
1972 '32 FB Express. Twin 318 / Edelbrock 1409s
Chesapeake City Md (Upper Bay / C&D Canal)
ComputerJoe
#18 Posted : Friday, July 22, 2011 5:57:01 AM(UTC)
ComputerJoe

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2007(UTC)
Posts: 603
Points: 1,119

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Thanks TR.

Lots of good stuff I didn't know. I was thinking of the "V" drive because Thunder Bird is only 26' long and dosen't have the bilge space some do.

I am intrigued with the Volvo stern unit now.

dougrose
#19 Posted : Saturday, July 23, 2011 10:10:23 AM(UTC)
dougrose

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Member, Administration, Admin
Joined: 12/7/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,332
Points: 1,746

Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 21 post(s)
OK, it is probably not relevant but I promised a picture of the flexible drive that I used on my old 28'. These drives are common in Europe, and you can buy them made of marine materials, costing several thousands. There are two advantages: First, the engine can be mounted flat (horizontal) so that a taller engine will fit. This is important if one is repowering with an in-line diesel. Second, the engine can be mounted on very soft mounts (there is no thrust to absorb) and will therefore not transmit vibration into the engine bed.



The propeller thrust does not go through the engine to the engine mounts, so a thrust bearing is needed. I got an industrial one and mounted it in line with the stuffing box, mounted through a hole in the web of an I-beam section that was secured to the stringers (engine bed) on either side. I used two split collars around the shaft to transfer the thrust (one for forward thrust and one for reverse thrust). I didn't want to rely on the grub screw in the thrust bearing itself.

The Euro flexible shaft is big bux, but such shafts are used in front-wheel-drive cars. I got one with two flanges (most have a flange at one end and a spline at the other) from a Cadillac Eldorado and machined up an adapter for each end. The flexible shafts will not insulate electrically so one of the adapters has to provide electrical insulation, as well as insulating the thrust bearing from the I-beam section.

This worked OK for me, allowing me to mount my tall 4-cylinder Perkins. I ended up bolting the engine directly to the mounting rails, didn't seem to matter.


1975 32' Flybridge Sedan, twin Perkins 6-354 diesels, 1:1.53 velvetdrives, 16 X 19 props. Merritt Island, Florida
fastjeff
#20 Posted : Saturday, July 23, 2011 11:35:20 PM(UTC)
fastjeff

Rank: Administration

Medals: aluminum star: For Marinette Owners Everywhere above the call of duty

Groups: Admin2, Admin2, Admin, Administration, Member
Joined: 12/5/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,133
Points: 5,732

Was thanked: 34 time(s) in 30 post(s)
Caddy parts? Damn clever!

Jeff
"...reality is not nearly as lovely as the world of Liberal Land. No wonder so many people want to go there." - Tom Sowell

dougrose
#21 Posted : Sunday, July 24, 2011 2:30:25 PM(UTC)
dougrose

Rank: Marinette Royal Aluminum Poster (300+) posts

Groups: Member, Administration, Admin
Joined: 12/7/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,332
Points: 1,746

Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 21 post(s)
Yeah, I was pretty proud of how that turned out. It looks so neat and well-thought-out, but actually it was a summer of running around looking for parts, then making stuff that didn't work and had to be thrown out, then running across something good in the junkyard. Jeff, I am sure you have been there.

The lady who bought the boat wanted no part of diesels, and restored her to a stock 318. I gave the flex shaft, for a fit check, to a guy who said he would give me some money for it, and haven't seen hide nor hair of him since. And, the photos I took are missing and I can't find the negatives.

I did find the other source: www.pythondrive.com The shafts are a little shorter than I remember, but I these will let you mount the engine level and couple to an inclined shaft, as I did.


1975 32' Flybridge Sedan, twin Perkins 6-354 diesels, 1:1.53 velvetdrives, 16 X 19 props. Merritt Island, Florida
Users browsing this topic
guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 1.9.5.5 | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.386 seconds.